[logback-dev] Reverted logback license back to LGPL

Ralph Goers Ralph.Goers at dslextreme.com
Sun Aug 10 00:09:45 CEST 2008

You shouldn't. That is why I'm wondering why the LPGL instead of the 
Apache license.

Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>> Frankly, I'm not sure why you prefer LGPL over the Apache License. Are 
>> you concerned that Log4j will take parts of Logback?
> Why, should I be concerned?

More information about the logback-dev mailing list