[logback-dev] Twitter Appender?
jhuxhorn at googlemail.com
Thu Aug 6 17:52:11 CEST 2009
On 06.08.2009, at 15:15, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
>> I think this would be sufficient for most cases but something like
>> a CONFIDENTIAL marker does also make a lot of sense. This would
>> simply be configured "around" the appender, right?
> Around the appender? I am not sure what you mean, but among the
> various data you pass to the appender, you could pass the name of the
> marker (a String) that triggers confidential treatment.
What I meant were filters. Sorry about using a rather confusing
I've never used filters before but it seems like a MarkerFilter would
be the "right" way to prevent the tweeting of confidential event
More information about the logback-dev