[logback-dev] RFC: LoggingEvent redesign
ceki at qos.ch
Wed Feb 25 16:09:29 CET 2009
Joern Huxhorn wrote:
> I disagree. I just implemented an enhanced version of the log4j NDC
> myself as you suggested on the SLF4J mailinglist. It's implemented quite
> similar to the logback MDC but isn't serialized/used by any standard
> appender. My multiplex-appenders, on the other hand, *are* evaluating
> it, thus adding an additional data point to the LoggingEvent.
> Wouldn't a similar extension be possible in Ralphs case?
How can multiplex-appenders access a field which does not exist in
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
More information about the logback-dev