[logback-dev] About LBCORE-224...
ceki at qos.ch
Fri Sep 30 17:59:56 CEST 2011
On 30/09/2011 4:29 PM, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:44:29 +0200, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>> This issue is still creeping me out.
> No reason for that.
>> Nevertheless, we should probably create an app that produces the
>> IllegalMonitorStateException and deliver it to the Java developers. If
>> this is a Java bug - and I have no other explanation - then it's a really
>> critical one...
> Did you read the last comment I added to the issue after it was closed?
Yes, but I did not understand the point you were trying to make.
"If you google for the exception practically all occurrences show _buggy
application code_ as the cause, "
indeed, but then you write:
"which explains why this happens only with Zookeeper (no kidding)."
You then write:
"The simplest explanation can be found here:
In PORT-168 Tim Pokorny talks about "unlocking the readlock when [he]
should have locking", that is not the situation we are in. Perhaps you
are saying that there is a problem in AppenderAttachableImpl?
More information about the logback-dev