[logback-user] Encoder vs. HTMLLayout?

Joern Huxhorn jhuxhorn at googlemail.com
Mon May 10 15:12:35 CEST 2010

It's a RollingFileAppender.

I'm actually not sure if the warning is emitted in this specific case.
I was just cleaning up all logback*.xml files of my work project and simply assumed that this would also emit a warning - which is maybe wrong.
I thought <layout> was consistently replaced with <encoder> but, again, I may be mistaken...

On 10.05.2010, at 14:24, Ceki Gülcü wrote:

> Hello Joern,
> What type is the enclosing appender?
> On 10/05/2010 2:18 PM, Joern Huxhorn wrote:
>> What is the correct replacement for
>> <layout class="ch.qos.logback.classic.html.HTMLLayout">
>>   <pattern>%-5level%d{HH:mm:ss.SSS}%logger{36}%msg%thread</pattern>
>> </layout>
>> I assume there is some replacement since Logback emits a warning at the moment.
>> http://logback.qos.ch/codes.html#layoutInsteadOfEncoder
>> I couldn't find one, though.
>> Cheers,
>> Joern.
> _______________________________________________
> Logback-user mailing list
> Logback-user at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user

More information about the Logback-user mailing list