[logback-user] 1.0 release date?

[Ralph Goers]

On Sep 6, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:

> On 06/09/2010 11:31 AM, Ari Meyer wrote:
>> Thanks Ralph -- good to see Ceki's response to the same question, albeit
>> 2 yrs earlier.  Makes me think I should have voiced my justifications
>> for a 1.0 label years ago, as doubtless many people are likewise waiting
>> for 1.0 to try out logback, but get by with log4j and don't press the
>> issue.  Will wait to hear me directly from Ceki on this.  Thanks also
>> for pointing out the issues lists.
> 
> There is no denying that people feel more comfortable with a 1.0 release than a 0.9 release. By the same token, people are more forgiving with breaking changes in a 0.9 release than in a 1.0 release. The extra wiggle room had my preference in the past.
> 
>> On this note, here's something I dug up from over 3 yrs ago, including
>> the "1.0 release" question: http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/08/logback.
>> Again this brings me back to my related question: /Are there some
>> must-have features that have yet to be implemented?/
> 
> There are no must-have features missing but I still have a few significant improvements I'd like to make before going 1.0.

I don't suppose support for structured data is one of them?

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20100906/832b0072/attachment.html>