[logback-user] Compiler selecting wrong Logger method

Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen thunderaxiom at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 13 10:36:32 CET 2012


Could you summarize your solution briefly here for the completeness of the
archives?

 

(Personally I’d just be happy with a resolution so I can easily have more
than two {}-arguments)

 

/Thorbjørn

 

From: logback-user-bounces at qos.ch [mailto:logback-user-bounces at qos.ch] On
Behalf Of Chris Pratt
Sent: 9. februar 2012 17:16
To: logback users list
Subject: Re: [logback-user] Compiler selecting wrong Logger method

 

Well, I'd be happy to throw my solution in as an option.  You, and Ceki, can
find more information at http://code.google.com/p/anodyzed There's
information in the wiki documents and more on the way when I get a chance.
If there's any information you think is missing, please don't hesitate to
let me know and I'll do what I can to remedy the situation.  Thanks.
  (*Chris *)

On Feb 9, 2012 1:00 AM, "Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen" <thunderaxiom at hotmail.com>
wrote:

Ceki has not yet decided on the proper way to do varargs in slf4j.  Until
then, no official API.

See http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31 for the full history.

/Thorbjørn

-----Original Message-----
From: logback-user-bounces at qos.ch [mailto:logback-user-bounces at qos.ch] On
Behalf Of Stein, Eric
Sent: 6. februar 2012 14:24
To: logback users list
Subject: Re: [logback-user] Compiler selecting wrong Logger method

<sigh/> I'm a nitwit. I got confused because at my last job we used a
wrapper around slf4j, and the signature of the method was debug(String,
Object...). Out of curiosity, is there a reason why that format wasn't used?
The compiler should be smart enough to call the more specific debug(String,
Object, Object) when appropriate. Changing from Object[] to Object... should
also be backwards-compatible...

Thanks, Marco!

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: logback-user-bounces at qos.ch [mailto:logback-user-bounces at qos.ch]
On Behalf Of BRESCIANI, MARCO (MARCO)
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 8:12 AM
To: logback users list
Subject: Re: [logback-user] Compiler selecting wrong Logger method

If I'm not wrong, using - Object[] - or the variable list - Object... - is a
bit different and in order to have the correct method, you should write
this:

       LOGGER.debug("Hi {} {} {}", new Object[] { arg1, arg2, arg3 });



MARCO BRESCIANI
ALCATEL-LUCENT
SENIOR SW CRAFT TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT ENG NETWORKS - IP DIVISION WT PRODUCT
UNIT via Trento, 30 - 20059 Vimercate (MB) - Italy
Phone: +39 039 686 6279 <tel:%2B39%20039%20686%206279> 
Fax: +39 039 686 5600 <tel:%2B39%20039%20686%205600> 
Marco.Bresciani at alcatel-lucent.com

-----Original Message-----
From: logback-user-bounces at qos.ch [mailto:logback-user-bounces at qos.ch]
On Behalf Of Stein, Eric
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 1:59 PM
To: logback-user at qos.ch
Subject: [logback-user] Compiler selecting wrong Logger method

I'm seeing a funny error when trying to write to logback.
       import org.slf4j.Logger;
       import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

       final String arg1 = "arg1";
       final String arg2 = "arg2";
       final String arg3 = "arg3";
       LOGGER.debug("Hi {} {}", arg1, arg2);
       LOGGER.debug("Hi {} {} {}", new String[] { arg1, arg2, arg3 });
       LOGGER.debug("Hi {} {} {}", arg1, arg2, arg3);

The last line is giving this error message:

The method debug(Marker, String, Object, Object) in the type Logger is not
applicable for the arguments (String, String, String, String)

I don't see why it isn't using the method whose signature is debug(String,
Object[]), especially given that I'm not using a Marker.
I'm running in Eclipse Indigo, and my classpath looks like this:

logback-classic-1.0.0.jar
logback-core-1.0.0.jar
slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar

Does anybody know why the compiler is using the wrong method?

Thanks,
Eric Stein
_________________________________________________
Don't gamble with your environmental information. Learn how the world's
largest on-demand environmental information management system can help you
mitigate your operating risk: www.locustec.com.

_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
Logback-user at qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
_________________________________________________
Don't gamble with your environmental information. Learn how the world's
largest on-demand environmental information management system can help you
mitigate your operating risk: www.locustec.com.

_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
Logback-user at qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user

_______________________________________________
Logback-user mailing list
Logback-user at qos.ch
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20120213/a77081af/attachment.html>


More information about the Logback-user mailing list