[slf4j-dev] JCL -> SLF4J bridge

[Graham Lea]

Good idea.
But whatever would one do with messages at the JCL 'trace' level?  :-P

robert burrell donkin wrote:

>(IMO a bit more on topic for this list)
>
>might be about time to think about creating a JCL -> SLF4J static
>bridge. (take LogFactory source, gut then link directly to SLF4J
>preserving binary but not semantic compatibility.) 
>
>this would give people an easy way to sample SLF4J without altering
>existing APIs. may also get some interesting feedback.
>
>- robert
>
>_______________________________________________
>dev mailing list
>dev at slf4j.org
>http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
>
>
>  
>