[slf4j-dev] [Bug 104] XLogger does not implement Logger

[bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch]

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104


Ceki Gulcu <listid at qos.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |listid at qos.ch
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #2 from Ceki Gulcu <listid at qos.ch>  2008-09-26 16:08:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> XLogger was modified to implement Logger but the fix does not set the FQCN to
> the XLogger class on the implemented methods. Thus the class, method and line
> number will be set to the XLogger call to the underlying logger instead of the
> caller of the XLogger.

OK, that can be easily fixed.

> Rather than fix this I suggest changing to use static methods taking a Logger
> as the first parameter as was proposed when the enhancement was submitted. See
> bug 86

Why, isn't the Xlogger implements Logger more convenient to use? Are there any
advantages to the API as proposed in bug 86?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.