[slf4j-dev] Release of SLF4J version 1.6.0-RC0

[Robert Elliot]

> 
> I've just taken a look at your code and I think it's quite neat.
> I've implemented it the other way around (i.e. a log-methods that receive a dumb Level enum) but I kind of like your idea of putting the log-methods into the enum instead.
> This leaves the Logger interface alone, which is nice.
> It should be extended by the various other methods, including isEnabled(Logger)/isEnabled(Logger, Marker), though - as you said.
> 
> Thanks for letting me know,
> Joern.

Thanks - actually I'd prefer your way, it seems more natural, but I could do this way without needing a change.

I've just tidied it up using reflection to make it much easier to add the missing methods, though probably at a small performance cost.

Rob

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://qos.ch/pipermail/slf4j-dev/attachments/20100425/f896f6ad/attachment.html>