[slf4j-dev] [Bug 268] New: Several Type-o's in SLF4j FAQ page

bugzilla-daemon at qos.ch bugzilla-daemon at qos.ch
Sat Aug 4 04:18:35 CEST 2012


http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268

           Summary: Several Type-o's in SLF4j FAQ page
           Product: SLF4J
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Macintosh
        OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.3
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P1
         Component: Unspecified
        AssignedTo: slf4j-dev at qos.ch
        ReportedBy: gordon at gordondickens.com


On Page http://explicitly/faq.html

Under "About the SLF4J Api", item 9
------------------------------
1. "parameterizere" should be "parameterize"


Under "I am getting IllegalAccessError exceptions when using SLF4J. Why is
that?"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2. "Typically, this occurs when your Maven pom.ml file incoprporates... "
should read "Typically, this occurs when your Maven pom.xml file
incorporates..."

3. "static initilizer" should be "static initializer"

4. "usig Eclipse" should be "using Eclipse"

5. "In your pom.xml file, excplicitly declaring a dependecy" should be "In your
pom.xml file, explicitly declaring a dependency" 


Under "In order to reduce the number of dependencies of our software we would
like to make SLF4J an optional dependency. Is that a good idea?"
---------------------------------------------------
6. "While this approach seems transperent enough" should be "While this
approach seems transparent enough"


Under "How do I exclude commons-logging as a Maven dependency?"
-----------------------------------------------------------
7. "alternative 1) explicit exlusion" should be "alternative 1) explicit
exclusion"

8. "The second decleration includes " should be "The second declaration
includes "

9. "place commons-logging.jar on your projet's " should be "place
commons-logging.jar on your project's "

10. "The following decleration adds the version99 repository " should be "The
following declaration adds the version99 repository" 

11. "the <dependencyManagement> section of your project will direct all
transtive " should be "the <dependencyManagement> section of your project will
direct all transitive "

Under "What is the fastest way of (not) logging?"
----------------------------------------
12.  "In the extremely rare case where the the "{}" "  has double 'the', should
read "In the extremely rare case where the "{}" "

13. "the backslash cracacter needs to be written as '\\'." should be "the
backslash character needs to be written as '\\'."


Under "Why doesn't the org.slf4j.Logger interface have methods for the FATAL
level?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
14. "JDBException " should be "JDBCException"

---------
15. The Question "In the presence of an exception/throwable, is it possible to
parametizere a logging statement?" should be "In the presence of an
exception/throwable, is it possible to parameterize a logging statement?"

16. "parametrization in the " should be "parameterization in the "


Under "Should Logger members of a class be declared as static?"
-----------------------------------------------------
17. "e.g log4j or logback" should be "e.g. log4j or logback"

18. "CPU time and have a slighlty " should be "CPU time and have a slightly "


-----------
Regards,
Gordon Dickens

twitter.com/gdickens
linkedin.com/in/gordondickens
Blog: technophile.gordondickens.com
GitHub: github.com/gordonad

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the slf4j-dev mailing list