[slf4j-dev] slf4j-migrator: format messages with parameterized logging

James A. N. Stauffer stauffer.james at gmail.com
Thu May 30 15:02:30 CEST 2013


Do I need to do something more than creating the pill request on GitHub? I
understand that people have other priorities -- I just wanted to make sure
that I didn't put it in a black hole. :-)


James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:00 PM, James A. N. Stauffer <
stauffer.james at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the tip. Created.
>
>
> James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Robert Elliot <rob at lidalia.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> I'm not a committer, so this isn't a rebuke or anything, just a friendly
>> suggestion. You might get more comments & chance of a merge via a pull
>> request on GitHub - easier for everyone.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On 21 May 2013, at 19:57, "James A. N. Stauffer" <
>> stauffer.james at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Attached fixes/improvements.
>>
>>
>> James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
>> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, James A. N. Stauffer <
>> stauffer.james at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have attached two patches that add support for parameterized logging.
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>>
>>> James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
>>> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:17 AM, James A. N. Stauffer <
>>> stauffer.james at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> (I didn't notice any FAQ/guidelines, etc so please direct me to them if
>>>> the exist so I can follow protocol.)
>>>>
>>>> My employer has many projects that use log4j and slf4j is now the
>>>> approved logging framework. I would like the conversion to make use of the
>>>> format messages with parameterized logging and remove the calls to
>>>> is*Enabled().
>>>>
>>>> It appears that slf4j-migrator doesn't support that so is there any
>>>> comment, direction, etc on me adding support for that?
>>>>
>>>> James A. N. Stauffer        http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
>>>> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> <0003-Fixed-minor-bugs-with-format-conversion.patch>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> slf4j-dev mailing list
>> slf4j-dev at qos.ch
>> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> slf4j-dev mailing list
>> slf4j-dev at qos.ch
>> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/slf4j-dev/attachments/20130530/374c4ad6/attachment.html>


More information about the slf4j-dev mailing list