<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Initialization (getILoggerFactory) is not thread safe"
href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176#c24">Comment # 24</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Initialization (getILoggerFactory) is not thread safe"
href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176">bug 176</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jperkins@redhat.com" title="James R. Perkins <jperkins@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">James R. Perkins</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=101&action=diff" name="attach_101" title="Patch for thread-safety issues during binding">attachment 101</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=101&action=edit" title="Patch for thread-safety issues during binding">[details]</a></span>
Patch for thread-safety issues during binding
The patch uses the same test previously attached. The implementation is
slightly different than the other patch. I don't think the reentrancy checking
should be necessary, but I don't know if other bindings actually invoke this
method again.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>