<html>
<head>
<base href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:andrew.i.swan@gmail.com" title="Andrew Swan <andrew.i.swan@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Andrew Swan</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - Add ability to log at a dynamic level"
href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133">bug 133</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>andrew.i.swan@gmail.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - Add ability to log at a dynamic level"
href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133#c15">Comment # 15</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - Add ability to log at a dynamic level"
href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133">bug 133</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:andrew.i.swan@gmail.com" title="Andrew Swan <andrew.i.swan@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Andrew Swan</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Robert Elliott put it perfectly in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=133#c4">comment 4</a> (and very politely, considering
the unjustified allegations of hackery against him).
For every person like me who comes here to "vote" for this feature, there are
100* more who find it missing and simply work around it quietly, which is sad.
Problems should be fixed once for the benefit of all.
What's the reluctance on the part of the maintainers? It can't be the
implementation, given that a patch has been supplied?
*Numbers may vary slightly from reality.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>