[slf4j-user] sl4fj/osgi/jcl11

[Costin]

Ceki Gulcu-2 wrote:
> 
> Costin wrote:
> 
>> You're right - I've overlooked this aspect. Would you consider adding a
>> trace level then to slf4j  :) ?
>> I recall reading about this in the official log4j documentation and I see
>> that in the end, it did make it to the api.
>> I understand that this is not log4j but still, it shows that there is
>> demand for this logging level plus it makes migration easier since
>> nothing
>> has to be lost in the transition.
>> Debug versus trace might seem like a small matter but I actually bumped
>> into some problems since I have a code base where trace is used for
>> low-level details such as loops or discovery and placing them as the same
>> level as debug yields enormous amounts of logs.
>> Basically, I end up with all or nothing and I need something in between.
> 
> 
> The TRACE level has been requested many times in the past, both in log4j 
> and in SLF4J. I guess that since people keep asking for it, we may as 
> well yield to popular demand. :-)
> 
> BYW, would it be possible for you to provide a reference to the class 
> generating the trace logs?
> 
> -- 
> Ceki Gülcü
> Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for
> Java.
> http://logback.qos.ch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> user mailing list
> user at slf4j.org
> http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> 

Cool.
Btw, by reference class you mean the sl4j wrapper over jcl11?

PS. sorry for the delay - my list subscription had email delivery turned
off...

Costin
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sl4fj-osgi-jcl11-tf3497398.html#a10108839
Sent from the Slf4J - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.