[slf4j-user] OT: Translation infrastructure requirements

Toolforger toolforger at durchholz.org
Thu Jun 20 08:29:53 CEST 2013

Am 20.06.2013 05:45, schrieb USHAKOV, Sergey:
> Well yes, I agree and take many of your points regarding separated
> programmer/translator procedures. I believe gettext may be convenient in
> certain development environments. Still I am not very comfortable with
> an idea that occasional change of an English word in gettext-based
> program has chances to break i18n for related texts silently...

Gettext offers diagnostics for that, so the breakage isn't silent.

More information about the slf4j-user mailing list