[logback-dev] synchronization style?
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen
ravn at runjva.com
Sat Jul 4 14:49:11 CEST 2009
Ceki Gulcu skrev:
> Also note that Sun excepted my bug report on this issue. See
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6855216
>
I see that it is registered as a wontfix bug and linked to
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4985566
which says that "The JVM does not entirely isolate java threads from the
scheduling properites of the underlying operating system." and that you
should use the concurrent utils instead.
I have not followed this closely, but is that an option?
> Your request for fair locking in appenders is not
> unreasonable. However, it will cause a measurable slow down in a large
> number of cases. It also feels like fixing the JVM. So, I need more
> evidence before going down the path of fair locking.
If the conclusion is that "it depends" how to do this right, perhaps it
should be configurable?
--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...plus... Tubular Bells!"
More information about the logback-dev
mailing list