[logback-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (LBCLASSIC-36) Synchronization of SimpleDateFormat object in DateConverter

[Ceki Gulcu (JIRA)]

    [ http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=11191#action_11191 ] 

Ceki Gulcu commented on LBCLASSIC-36:
-------------------------------------

Thank you for these new figures. Your computer is obvious much faster than mine.

I don't think the additional dependence  on Jodatime is justified by the above figures. Do you?


> Synchronization of SimpleDateFormat object in DateConverter
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LBCLASSIC-36
>                 URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-36
>             Project: logback-classic
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Other
>    Affects Versions: unspecified
>         Environment: Operating System: All
> Platform: All
>            Reporter: Anders Hammar
>            Assignee: Ceki Gulcu
>         Attachments: DateConverter_patch.java, DateFormatPerfTest.java, dateformattest.zip
>
>
> According to the API documentation of SimpleDateFormat, date formats are not synchronized and it is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread.
> However, a possibly simpler (mer efficient) solution would be to synchronize on the SimpleDateFormat object in the convert() method to prevent two threads to access it concurrently.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira