[logback-dev] Replacing CallerData class

[Maarten Bosteels]

Hi,

No objections at all.

Looking at my .proto file it's indeed pretty obvious that CallerData and
StackTraceElement are quite similar :-)
http://code.google.com/p/firewood/source/browse/trunk/compare-formats/src/main/java/com/googlecode/firewood/protobuf/logging.proto

I've done some benchmarking with protobuf (using the Corpus), and it seems
to be at least 4 times faster than Java serialization.
Will soon post the results and the code.

regards,
Maarten

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Ceki Gulcu <ceki at qos.ch> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to replace the CallerData class with
> StackTraceElement. The two classes contain the same fields.
> StackTraceElement is part of the JDK. I can think of no valid reason
> to duplicate a class found in the JDK.
>
> Comments/objections?
>
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
> Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for
> Java.
> http://logback.qos.ch
> _______________________________________________
> logback-dev mailing list
> logback-dev at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://qos.ch/pipermail/logback-dev/attachments/20090318/d96aeea2/attachment.htm>