[logback-dev] Replacing CallerData class

[Ceki Gulcu]

I don't see packaging data being part of caller data. If it were, we
would need configuration code to support this case, which would
unnecessarily bloat the code. Just as importantly, the user would have
to know how to enable/disable this feature. It's just not worth the
trouble.

If you really needed the packaging data, you would write

   logger.debug("I am interested in package data", new Throwable("");



Joern Huxhorn wrote:
> 
> Well, I agree with your performance argument but the CPD field of 
> STEProxy doesn't need to be used in the common case.
> 
> I'd use STEProxy simply to keep the possibility to activate such info on 
> demand, i.e. while debugging but not in production.
> It could certainly come in quite handy under some circumstances, e.g. 
> while walking the path of jar hell.
> 
> Joern.

-- 
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch