[logback-dev] [JIRA] Commented: (LBCLASSIC-184) Remove Cyclic Dependencies between Classic, SLF4J API and SLF4J Impl
Gunnar Wagenknecht (JIRA)
noreply-jira at qos.ch
Mon Feb 8 12:54:33 CET 2010
[ http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=11516#action_11516 ]
Gunnar Wagenknecht commented on LBCLASSIC-184:
----------------------------------------------
Thanks Hugues for outlining the steps. The question is whether "org.slf4j.impl" must be considered part of Logback classic from an architecture point of view. This would mean that it's not intended to be extracted from the Logback classic implementation, i.e. code in Logback classic is allowed to reference code in "org.slf4j.impl" and vice versa.
> Remove Cyclic Dependencies between Classic, SLF4J API and SLF4J Impl
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LBCLASSIC-184
> URL: http://jira.qos.ch/browse/LBCLASSIC-184
> Project: logback-classic
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Other
> Affects Versions: 0.9.18
> Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht
> Assignee: Logback dev list
> Attachments: context-selector.patch, mdc-move.patch
>
>
> When working with Logback as OSGi bundles I found some issues regarding cyclic dependencies. Basically, code in "org.slf4j.impl" depends on "org.slf4j.api" as well as Logback classic. This is fine. However, code in Logback classic also depends on "org.slf4j.impl". This introduces a cycle.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.qos.ch/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the logback-dev
mailing list