[logback-dev] Expanding version99 repository
ceki
ceki at qos.ch
Fri Aug 3 12:55:48 CEST 2012
On 03.08.2012 12:23, Robert Elliot wrote:
Hi Robert,
> Would there be any appetite for adding other jars to version99.qos.ch?
Appetite? No. However, it's something we can support (please read on).
> There are various jars in maven central that are composites of other
> jars. Maven's transitive dependency behaviour makes it very difficult
> to prevent those composite jars creeping on to the classpath,
> introducing multiple different versions of the same class. For
> example, if you want to use hamcrest 1.3 with junit 4.10 you can do so
> by bringing in junit:junit-dep:4.10 and
> org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core:1.3; however, it only requires one
> transitive dependency to bring in junit:junit:4.7 (which combines the
> classes from junit:junit-dep:4.7 and org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core:1.2)
> and it's going to be random whether you get the 4.10 or the 4.7
> versions of the junit classes and the 1.2 or 1.3 versions of the
> hamcrest classes.
While I understand what you are trying to explain I don't see how it
matches what is effectively found in junit jar files. For example,
both junit:junit:4.7 and 4.10 contain classes from the org.hamcrest
package. What am I missing?
> A junit:junit:99-empty in version99.qos.ch would solve this issue.
>
> Bit cheeky to piggy back on qos.ch, but it would be very useful...
Yes, it would be cheeky bordering on rude. I am for publishing
junit:junit:99-empty but only if the Junit folks *officially* sanction
it.
In any case, I very much appreciate the proposal.
Best regards,
--
Ceki
http://tinyurl.com/proLogback
More information about the logback-dev
mailing list