[logback-dev] Looking at MongoDBAppender
Christian Trutz
christian.trutz at belaso.de
Mon Jun 18 22:18:15 CEST 2012
Hi Ceki,
>There is no Jenkins instance for logback/logback-extensions. There was
>a CI for logback a few years back but I no longer had the time to
>maintain the instance.
I configure a Jenkins instance on http://www.cloudbees.com/
for logback-extensions
1) a new build is triggered instantly after a "git push" on GitHub (via
service hook)
2) Jenkins instance is https://smilebase.ci.cloudbees.com/
3) if build fails a email is send to logback-dev at qos.ch
Christian
2012/6/18 ceki <ceki at qos.ch>
> On 18.06.2012 17:32, Christian Trutz wrote:
>
>> Hi ceki,
>>
>> thank you very much for your remarks :-)
>>
>> Remark 1): yes i agree with you, that integration tests are also very
>> usefull and only
>> with integration tests you know, that the software do what you want.
>> I thought that maybe Maven profiles could be very useful to separate
>> execution of
>> integration tests. Only with profile (say "integration-tests") the
>> integration tests will
>> be executed. Have we any Hudson/Jenkins instance for logback-extensions?
>>
>
> You would need to have an oracle-profile, mysql-profile,
> postgres-profile and mongo-db profile. I think it might be easier to
> keep track of the machines in code as is done in
> DBAppenderIntegrationTest. Using profiles has the advantage of
> decoupling the tests run from the test code. The isConformantHost
> check is quick-and-dirty but gets the job done.
>
> There is no Jenkins instance for logback/logback-extensions. There was
> a CI for logback a few years back but I no longer had the time to
> maintain the instance.
>
>
> Remark 2): I am using TestNG only because it was included, not because I
>> think it
>> is necesary. I will change the logback-ext-mongodb unit tests to JUnit
>> tests.
>>
>
> That would be great thanks.
>
>
> Remark 3):
>> >If I understand correctly, Jmockit relies on a java-agent to execute?
>> Yes, with jdk1.5 it relies on java-agent, with jdk1.6. it runs also
>> without java-agent.
>> We have jdk1.6. so we do not need any java-agent configurations, the
>> tests run OTB.
>>
>
> Looking at [1], although ootb there is a javaagent attached to the
> JVM. I might be wrong here but using a Java agent to run tests seems
> like an awfully heavy handed method. It affects every single class
> loaded into memory. The MockitoJUnitRunner approach seems less
> invasive imho.
>
> [1] http://tinyurl.com/cflvr9r
>
>
> Remark 4): Ohh ok, I will separate logback-ext-mongodb into classic and
>> access ...
>>
>
> Thank you. To be precise, it's actually logback-mongodb-parent pom
> module plus 3 children: logback-mongodb-core, logback-mongodb-classic
> and logback-mongodb-access.
>
>
> >Notwithstanding the above remarks, I am looking forward to testing
>> logback-mongodb-* once I install MongoDB on my local machine.
>> OK please look also to
>> https://github.com/qos-ch/**logback-extensions/wiki/**MongoDB<https://github.com/qos-ch/logback-extensions/wiki/MongoDB>
>>
>
> I think it would be easier if you could push the docs onto
> http://logback.qos.ch directly. We can discuss this later.
>
>
> --
> Ceki
> http://twitter.com/#!/ceki
> ______________________________**_________________
> logback-dev mailing list
> logback-dev at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/**listinfo/logback-dev<http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/logback-dev/attachments/20120618/21b3304e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the logback-dev
mailing list