[logback-user] jul-bridge?

[Eric Crahen]

You bet, http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38

Along similar lines, I wonder if it makes sense to move log4j-bridge up to
slf4j, or the jcl-bridge down into logback? Keeping all of the facade code
in one place.

On 2/7/07, Ceki Gülcü <listid at qos.ch> wrote:
>
> At 05:08 PM 2/7/2007, Eric Crahen wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >   I've been experimenting with logback + slf4j and have been quite
> > impressed. The slf4j API is what I write new code against, and I'm able
> > to leverage the jcl104-over-slf4j facade and logback-log4j-bridge to
> > intercept calls to commons logging and log4j respectively. This works
> > really well so far. I do have one other legacy logging API that is used
> > in some circumstances. That's the jdk14 jul api. Has anyone written a
> jul
> > Handler that will route jul calls to logback? Any comments on how well
> > that has/would work out?
>
> Many thanks. It's always a pleasure to hear good things about one's work.
>
> Except for bug#23 (see [1]) which is usually not blocking, the
> jcl104-over-slf4j bridge is known to work well for some time now. The
> logback-log4j-bridge is much more recent and works surprisingly well thus
> far. We currently use it in all our legacy systems in production.
>
> Although we have not attempted to do so, bridging the jul API should be
> possible. After all, x4juli does it. Would you mind creating a bug report
> so that we implement this feature for the next release of logback?
>
> [1] http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23
>
> >Thanks,
> >
> >--
> >
> >- Eric
>
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
> Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for
> Java.
> http://logback.qos.ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Logback-user mailing list
> Logback-user at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
>



-- 

- Eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20070207/0976687b/attachment.htm