[logback-user] Dual licensing logback

Stephen Duncan Jr stephen.duncan at gmail.com
Fri Sep 18 13:31:27 CEST 2009

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Ceki Gulcu <ceki at qos.ch> wrote:

> Hello all,
> After a very long investigation resulting in a better understanding of
> licensing issues, I think dual-licensing logback under EPL 1.0 and
> LGPL 2.1 would help with the project's adoption.
> Licensees can then choose either the terms of the EPL or the terms of
> the LGPL when they use logback.  The EPL license will placate
> organizations which refuse the restrictions imposed by the LGPL
> whereas the LGPL license ensures continuity in licensing and also
> keeps the door open for licensees already bound by the terms of
> (L)GPL.
> Comments?
> ps. If you intend to respond, please do so on logback-users at .
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
> Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for
> Java.
> http://logback.qos.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Logback-user mailing list
> Logback-user at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user

I agree that this would be a positive move.

Stephen Duncan Jr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20090918/cf2a6d58/attachment.htm>

More information about the Logback-user mailing list