[logback-user] Legacy Log4j Question

[Nikolas Everett]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ceki Gulcu <ceki at qos.ch> wrote:
>
>  > If you have a hard dependency on log4j that you can't change then I
> > guess you have to use log4j.
>
> I agree but may be the caller could be satisfied with NOP.
>
> It should be possible to satisfy most callers except perhaps in
> certain cases which could become rather hard to diagnose due to the
> NOP trickery...


In that case it might be nice to let the caller implement the log4j
functionality or at least allow it to be optionally included so the caller
*can* implement it.

For what it is worth it I haven't ever had this problem.

--Nik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20101027/ef6e57ad/attachment.html>