[logback-user] Legacy Log4j Question

Ceki Gulcu ceki at qos.ch
Wed Oct 27 17:20:02 CEST 2010

On 27.10.2010 16:48, Robert Elliot wrote:
> Since the existing log4j-over-slf4j doesn't include the classes at all the caller could implement them, couldn't they?  Just in a separate jar.

Yes, of course.

More information about the Logback-user mailing list