[logback-user] 1.0 release date?

Ari Meyer ari.meyer at gmail.com
Tue Sep 7 00:32:57 CEST 2010

Thanks, Ceki.

Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> On 06/09/2010 11:31 AM, Ari Meyer wrote:
>> Thanks Ralph -- good to see Ceki's response to the same question, albeit
>> 2 yrs earlier.  Makes me think I should have voiced my justifications
>> for a 1.0 label years ago, as doubtless many people are likewise waiting
>> for 1.0 to try out logback, but get by with log4j and don't press the
>> issue.  Will wait to hear me directly from Ceki on this.  Thanks also
>> for pointing out the issues lists.
> There is no denying that people feel more comfortable with a 1.0 
> release than a 0.9 release. By the same token, people are more 
> forgiving with breaking changes in a 0.9 release than in a 1.0 
> release. The extra wiggle room had my preference in the past.
>> On this note, here's something I dug up from over 3 yrs ago, including
>> the "1.0 release" question: http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/08/logback.
>> Again this brings me back to my related question: /Are there some
>> must-have features that have yet to be implemented?/
> There are no must-have features missing but I still have a few 
> significant improvements I'd like to make before going 1.0.
>> Best,
>> Ari
> _______________________________________________
> Logback-user mailing list
> Logback-user at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user

More information about the Logback-user mailing list