[logback-user] Using conditional processing

[Robert Elliot]

I much prefer things to fail fast and ugly rather than gracefully skipping over and leaving me scratching my head as to why it's working but not the way I expected.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael C Rosenstein" <mcr at mdibl.org>
> To: logback-user at qos.ch
> Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 1:33:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [logback-user] Using conditional processing
> > In the absence of Janino on the classpath, logback should now
> > gracefully
> > skip over the conditional part.
> 
> I wonder if it should be less graceful and produce an error/warning to
> indicate that the conditional is going to be ignored?
> _______________________________________________
> Logback-user mailing list
> Logback-user at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user