[logback-user] Approaches to implement RFC5424 structured data support
ceki
ceki at qos.ch
Mon Jun 18 19:44:47 CEST 2012
On 18.06.2012 18:53, Ralph Goers wrote:
> As you noted this subject has come up before. It was one of the things
> that ultimately motivated me to go off and create Log4j 2. I
> abandoned the fork at Github when it became clear that there wasn't
> going to be a good resolution to the issue.
I've got to admit, payload support in SLF4J/logback is pretty bad.
--
Ceki
http://twitter.com/#!/ceki
More information about the Logback-user
mailing list