[logback-user] commons-logging -> sl4j -> logback

[Chris Pratt]

I have a bit of a discussion on why a more robust formatting option is
desirable.  Check out http://code.google.com/p/anodyzed/wiki/Log
and please feel free to ask any questions that come to mind.
  (*Chris*)


On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Brett Walker <brett.walker at geometryit.com>wrote:

> It’s may bad. {} is the only syntax allowed****
>
> ** **
>
> It would be a nice addition to have positional, but how warranted is it?**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Brett****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* logback-user-bounces at qos.ch [mailto:logback-user-bounces at qos.ch] *On
> Behalf Of *David Harkness
> *Sent:* Friday, 8 February 2013 10:46 AM
>
> *To:* logback users list
> *Subject:* Re: [logback-user] commons-logging -> sl4j -> logback****
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Brett Walker <brett.walker at geometryit.com>
> wrote:****
>
> This avoids calling the toString() method on the objects until the log
> message is actually required to be logged.****
>
>
> Sorry, Brett, I changed the subject without actually changing the subject
> since it was semi-related. :) I was asking about "{0}" versus "{}".****
>
> ** **
>
> David****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Logback-user mailing list
> Logback-user at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20130207/4029f0b2/attachment.html>