[logback-user] commons-logging -> sl4j -> logback

[Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen]

I think the primary focus for this facility has been raw speed.  

 

In my understanding the primary usage of positional is to be able to
translate sentences more fluently into another human language.  This is
normally not necessary for log statements, as you are fully in control of
both message and arguments.  What would your use case be?

 

 

From: logback-user-bounces at qos.ch [mailto:logback-user-bounces at qos.ch] On
Behalf Of Brett Walker
Sent: 8. februar 2013 00:51
To: logback users list
Subject: Re: [logback-user] commons-logging -> sl4j -> logback

 

It’s may bad. {} is the only syntax allowed

 

It would be a nice addition to have positional, but how warranted is it?

 

Brett

 

From: logback-user-bounces at qos.ch [mailto:logback-user-bounces at qos.ch] On
Behalf Of David Harkness
Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013 10:46 AM
To: logback users list
Subject: Re: [logback-user] commons-logging -> sl4j -> logback

 

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Brett Walker <brett.walker at geometryit.com>
wrote:

This avoids calling the toString() method on the objects until the log
message is actually required to be logged.


Sorry, Brett, I changed the subject without actually changing the subject
since it was semi-related. :) I was asking about "{0}" versus "{}".

 

David

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20130208/4f42c784/attachment-0001.html>