[logback-user] Logback in combination with slf4j: which versions should I use ?

[Abraham Lin]

Logback 1.0.11 is built against version 1.7.4 of SLF4J:
http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=ch/qos/logback/logback-parent/1.0.11/logback-parent-1.0.11.pom


On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:38 AM, stlecho <stlecho at gmail.com> wrote:

> Robert, the combination you're suggesting unfortunately results in
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> ch.qos.logback.core.util.
> Loader.getResourceOccurenceCount(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;)Ljava/util/List;
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Robert Kuhar [via Logback] <[hidden
> email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=11696&i=0>> wrote:
>
>> I think you go to the heads:  SLF4J 1.7.5' and Logback 1.0.11'
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:48 AM, stlecho <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=11695&i=0>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> With regards to the combination of logback-core and slf4j-api.
>>> If I want to use v1.0.11 of logback-core, which version of slf4j-api
>>> should
>>> I use to avoid the getResourceOccurenceCount error ?
>>>
>>> -logback-core v0.9.30 in combination with slf4j-api v1.6.3 works
>>> perfectly
>>>
>>> -logback-core v1.0.11 in combination with slf4j-api v1.6.3 results in
>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>
>>> ch.qos.logback.core.util.Loader.getResourceOccurenceCount(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;)Ljava/util/List;
>>>
>>> -logback-core v1.0.11 in combination with slf4j-api v1.7.5 works
>>> perfectly
>>> result in java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>
>>> ch.qos.logback.core.util.Loader.getResourceOccurenceCount(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;)Ljava/util/List;
>>>
>>> Regards, Stefan Lecho
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://logback.10977.n7.nabble.com/Logback-in-combination-with-slf4j-which-versions-should-I-use-tp11694.html
>>> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Logback-user mailing list
>>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=11695&i=1>
>>> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Logback-user mailing list
>> [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=11695&i=2>
>> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>>
>> http://logback.10977.n7.nabble.com/Logback-in-combination-with-slf4j-which-versions-should-I-use-tp11694p11695.html
>>  To unsubscribe from Logback in combination with slf4j: which versions
>> should I use ?, click here.
>> NAML<http://logback.10977.n7.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: Logback in combination with slf4j:
> which versions should I use ?<http://logback.10977.n7.nabble.com/Logback-in-combination-with-slf4j-which-versions-should-I-use-tp11694p11696.html>
>
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive<http://logback.10977.n7.nabble.com/Users-f3.html>at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Logback-user mailing list
> Logback-user at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/attachments/20130329/a64bc40b/attachment-0001.html>