[slf4j-dev] Re: slf4j and log4j

[Ceki Gülcü]

At 06:49 5/1/2005, Simon Kitching wrote:

>Actually, as SLF4J is just 4 simple core classes + 2 classes per
>concrete logging library, there isn't much need for a large pool of
>committers. I would say 3 people (to ensure project continuity) is as
>many as SLF4J would ever need.
>
>The number of people who can *vote* on SLF4J design-related matters is a
>different issue. I guess the committers for SLF4J are the ones that
>decide the policy on that, but I would recommend that the policy be that
>  * the committers on SLF4J
>  * plus any committer on log4j
>  * plus any committer on JCL
>all be entitled to vote, and that voting follow standard ASF procedures.

How about just people who have demonstrated to have a clue and have shown 
interest in participating? While the set of people who have a clue may be 
large, when intersected with the set of people who have shown interest, the 
set gets reduced to:

   Robert, Simon, Jake, Ceki, (Brian?)


>Regards,
>
>Simon

-- 
Ceki Gülcü

   The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/