[slf4j-dev] [Bug 93] New: Small glitch/inconsistency in MessageFormatter.format(..) behaviour as well as testcase
bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch
bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch
Tue Jul 29 17:29:05 CEST 2008
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
Summary: Small glitch/inconsistency in
MessageFormatter.format(..) behaviour as well as
testcase
Product: SLF4J
Version: 1.5.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P1
Component: Core API
AssignedTo: dev at slf4j.org
ReportedBy: joern at huxhorn.de
While I was reimplementing the formatting logic of MessageFormatter.format(..)
for Lilith I found something that is most likely a small glitch in the
implementation as well as the test.
I used all the slf4j testcases to verify my implementation and one of the tests
failed:
result = MessageFormatter.format("Value {} is smaller than \\{", i1, i2);
assertEquals("Value 1 is smaller than \\{", result);
To be honest, I don't understand why this test does not fail.
The result that I would expect (and that my implementation produces) would be
"Value 1 is smaller than {" since the { is properly escaped by a \.
Another testcase that follows directly seems to indicate that an escaped
parameter start character should simply be printed, regardless if a } follows
or not.
result = MessageFormatter.format("Value {} is smaller than \\{tail", i1,
i2);
assertEquals("Value 1 is smaller than {tail", result);
I can't see a reasonable semantic difference between an escaped { in the middle
or at the end of a message pattern.
So I'd suggest to change the aforementioned testcase to
result = MessageFormatter.format("Value {} is smaller than \\{", i1, i2);
assertEquals("Value 1 is smaller than {", result);
and change the implementation accordingly.
I don't consider this as a big problem since it's a very, very special case,
i.e. it will only show up if the message pattern ends with an escaped {.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the slf4j-dev
mailing list