[slf4j-dev] [Bug 86] Add logging utility methods

[Ralph Goers]

Yes, I looked at the profiler. That is a little more complicated than 
what I have.

I'll create a new entry for it in bugzilla.

Also, I realized after I submitted the code for this enhancement that I 
used StringBuilder instead of String concatenation, forgetting that 
SLF4J is supposed to run on 1.4. I'll make changes and resubmit that also.

Ralph

Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> Have you seen the new Profiler implementation? I found it really useful.
>
> Regardless of whether its your version or the one in logback, I agree that 
> placing such code in slf4j-extension (or whatever) instead of logback is a very 
> good idea.
>
> Anyway, I'd be happy to look at your timing methods.
>
> You might want to enter a bug report so that this does not fall through the cracks.
>
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>   
>> I have a related question. I have built timing methods somewhat similar 
>> to the StopWatch in logback. It seems more appropriate to me that these 
>> be in SLF4J than logback since they really don't rely on any particular 
>> logger implementation. I'd be happy to provide my version of these for 
>> you to review if you have an interest.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch wrote:
>>     
>>> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86
>>>
>>>
>>> listid at qos.ch changed:
>>>
>>>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>              Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------- Comment #2 from listid at qos.ch  2008-06-03 22:18 -------
>>> Will look into this after 1.5.1 is released.
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev at slf4j.org
>> http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at slf4j.org
> http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>