[slf4j-dev] [Bug 38] JUL bridge/router

[bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch]

http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38





------- Comment #5 from listid at qos.ch  2008-05-30 12:15 -------
Hello Joern,

I agree with your observation that it is more robust to use thresholds instead
of strict equality to map the JUL levels to slf4j. I've adapted Christian's
code to reflect your comments. For more details please refer to revision 1024
[1].

BTW, this is still ongoing work.

[1] http://svn.slf4j.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=1024


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.