[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1199 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

[Ralph Goers]

Sure, the indentation would be consistent with the coding standards for 
the project.  My personal style is as shown so it invariably shows 
through on occasion. I noticed in the commit log that developers is 
spelled incorrectly. I will fix that.

Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Hello Ralph,
>
> Thank you for documenting the org.slf4j.ext package. My recent commit below 
> brings changes in indentation which should be invisible to users. Otherwise, I 
> added a reference to XLogger and XLoggerFactory in the javadocs.
>
> If you don't mind, I would like to change the indentation of sample code from
>
>    void foo()
>    {
>      whatever..
>    }
>
> to
>
>    void foo() {
>      whatever..
>    }
>
> Release of SLF4J 1.5.4, which fixes critical bug 106, should follow within the 
> next few hours.
>
> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
>
>
> ceki at slf4j.org wrote:
>   
>> Author: ceki
>> Date: Thu Oct 16 17:27:03 2008
>> New Revision: 1199
>>
>> Modified:
>>    slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html
>>
>> Log:
>> - mostly indentation changes 
>>
>> Otherwise,
>>
>> - added a reference to XLogger javadocs
>> - added a reference to XLoggerFactory javadocs
>> - explicitly was spelled as explicitely
>>
>> Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html
>> ==============================================================================
>>     
>
>
>