[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1307 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

[Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen]

Ceki Gulcu skrev:
>
> See http://slf4j.org/faq.html#declared_static
> The official stance is that there is no official stance. :-)
If I understand the link correctly the primary reason for recommending 
"not static" is to allow repository selectors to work with logback?

Do you have benchmark figures already for the overhead of creating a 
logger for each object?

Am I right in assuming that the logback mechanism for looking up loggers 
is faster than in log4j?  There must be a reason for the original 
recommandation :)

-- 
  Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen  "...plus... Tubular Bells!"