[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r1321 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages

[Ceki Gulcu]

Hello Thorbjoern,

I am in favor of "code prettifiers" as long as they allow us to emphasize, e.g. 
present in bold, selected parts of the code, but if not, then I prefer ugly. :-)

Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
> Ceki Gulcu skrev:
>> Hello Thorbjørn,
>>
>> Do you intend to pursue this effort on coloring? As this revision 
>> stands, I don't see the point... Put differently, it looks like a lot 
>> of effort for a meager result. WDYT?
> 
> Been busy with other things the last few days.
> 
> Meager?  Don't think so!   And it was trivially simple to do with vim, 
> so if it would make it more readable it is a benefit to the documentation.
> 
> I was inspired by the way StackOverflow presents its code snippets, and 
> it turns out they use Prettify:
> 
> http://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/
> 
> which uses Javascript.  Perhaps that would both be easier, simpler to 
> maintain and ... well... prettier :)
> 

-- 
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch