[slf4j-dev] Why no error(Throwable) on the Logger interface?
Ceki Gulcu
ceki at qos.ch
Thu May 28 18:17:54 CEST 2009
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Anyway, what I was trying to say is that you can typically get away
> with less detailed log messages when you have access to the source
> code (and understand it, e.g. you known how the controller in your
> example it works) and detailed logging metadata (thread names, line
> numbers, stack trackes, etc.). But in cases where this is not true
> (and given the purpose of SLF4J, I'd argue that this applies to the
> majority of SLF4J deployments), a clear log message is often extremely
> useful.
Hi Jukka,
Are you saying in the majority of SLF4J deployments the thread name is
not available? By implication, I deduce that in your opinion the
majority of deployments use j.u.l. as the underlying logging
framework. Is that correct?
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
More information about the slf4j-dev
mailing list