[slf4j-dev] [Bug 138] Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings
bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch
bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch
Tue Feb 23 16:26:50 CET 2010
http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138
Dimo Velev <dimo.velev at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dimo.velev at gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from Dimo Velev <dimo.velev at gmail.com> 2010-02-23 16:26:49 ---
Hi,
I also find it better to use a Set in this case instead of a List. The reason
for this is that a Set better communicates the actual usage of the
implementations-collection in this piece of code (LoggerFactory). When you see
a List you automatically think of a collection which allows duplicates. Well,
in this case I think that the implementation actually means that this is a
collection which does not care for duplicates and this is expressed by a Set.
Just my own opinion as someone reading the source code.
Best regards,
Dimo
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the slf4j-dev
mailing list