[slf4j-dev] [Bug 138] Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings

bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch
Tue Feb 23 16:26:50 CET 2010


http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138


Dimo Velev <dimo.velev at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dimo.velev at gmail.com




--- Comment #13 from Dimo Velev <dimo.velev at gmail.com>  2010-02-23 16:26:49 ---
Hi,

I also find it better to use a Set in this case instead of a List. The reason
for this is that a Set better communicates the actual usage of the
implementations-collection in this piece of code (LoggerFactory). When you see
a List you automatically think of a collection which allows duplicates. Well,
in this case I think that the implementation actually means that this is a
collection which does not care for duplicates and this is expressed by a Set.

Just my own opinion as someone reading the source code.

Best regards,
Dimo


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the slf4j-dev mailing list