[slf4j-dev] slf4j-migrator: format messages with parameterized logging

[Robert Elliot]

No, I don't think so - it's been noticed!

Rob

----- Original Message -----
> From: "James A. N. Stauffer" <stauffer.james at gmail.com>
> To: "slf4j developers list" <slf4j-dev at qos.ch>
> Sent: Thursday, 30 May, 2013 2:02:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [slf4j-dev] slf4j-migrator: format messages with parameterized logging
> Do I need to do something more than creating the pill request on
> GitHub? I understand that people have other priorities -- I just
> wanted to make sure that I didn't put it in a black hole. :-)
> 
> 
> 
> James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:00 PM, James A. N. Stauffer <
> stauffer.james at gmail.com > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for the tip. Created.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Robert Elliot < rob at lidalia.org.uk >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I'm not a committer, so this isn't a rebuke or anything, just a
> friendly suggestion. You might get more comments & chance of a merge
> via a pull request on GitHub - easier for everyone.
> 
> 
> Rob
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 May 2013, at 19:57, "James A. N. Stauffer" <
> stauffer.james at gmail.com > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Attached fixes/improvements.
> 
> 
> 
> James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, James A. N. Stauffer <
> stauffer.james at gmail.com > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I have attached two patches that add support for parameterized
> logging. Comments?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:17 AM, James A. N. Stauffer <
> stauffer.james at gmail.com > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> (I didn't notice any FAQ/guidelines, etc so please direct me to them
> if the exist so I can follow protocol.)
> 
> 
> My employer has many projects that use log4j and slf4j is now the
> approved logging framework. I would like the conversion to make use of
> the format messages with parameterized logging and remove the calls to
> is*Enabled().
> 
> 
> It appears that slf4j-migrator doesn't support that so is there any
> comment, direction, etc on me adding support for that?
> 
> 
> James A. N. Stauffer http://jamesjive.blogspot.com
> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <0003-Fixed-minor-bugs-with-format-conversion.patch>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-dev mailing list
> slf4j-dev at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-dev mailing list
> slf4j-dev at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-dev mailing list
> slf4j-dev at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev