[slf4j-dev] Prepared branch for slf4j 2.0
Ceki Gülcü
ceki at qos.ch
Tue Apr 30 13:18:35 CEST 2019
Hi Federico,
I mean that it is preferable to make bw compatible changes directly to
slf4j-api module instead of introducing a new module.
Cheers,
--
Ceki
On 30/04/2019 10:25, Federico Fissore wrote:
> Ceki ha scritto il 29/04/19 alle 22:55:
>> Hi Federico,
>>
>> Your pull request has a number of interesting ideas. I think some of
>> them should be merged into the backward compatible implementation that
>> I just committed a few minutes ago.
>>
>> Backward compatibility is the main hurdle to clear. Once that is done,
>> as now seems to be the case, we can further improve the API piecemeal.
>
>
> I'm sure the code in that PR is backwards compatible. Can you point me
> to where those changes have broken backwards compatibility?
>
> best
>
> federico
More information about the slf4j-dev
mailing list