[slf4j-dev] Proposal for SLF4J 2.0 Logger API

[Ceki]

On 19.12.2019 21:35, Remko Popma wrote:

> For the SLF4J API to be genuinely generic enough to span the 
> requirements and abilities of many possible logging backends, it should 
> not be too opinionated.
> 
> Have you had a chance to look at Yang et al’s work on NanoLog (
> https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc18/atc18-yang.pdf,
> https://github.com/PlatformLab/NanoLog)?

Thank you for the link. I am reading right now.