[slf4j-dev] Proposal for SLF4J 2.0 Logger API

[Remko Popma]

All, Happy New Year!
Ceki, have you had a chance to consider my proposal?

I still strongly believe that having a logging API that allows Objects
to be logged:
1) opens various possibilities for logging implementations
2) has few (if any) drawbacks.

Thoughts?

Kind regards,
Remko

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:08 AM Ceki <ceki at qos.ch> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19.12.2019 21:35, Remko Popma wrote:
>
> > For the SLF4J API to be genuinely generic enough to span the
> > requirements and abilities of many possible logging backends, it should
> > not be too opinionated.
> >
> > Have you had a chance to look at Yang et al’s work on NanoLog (
> > https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc18/atc18-yang.pdf,
> > https://github.com/PlatformLab/NanoLog)?
>
> Thank you for the link. I am reading right now.
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-dev mailing list
> slf4j-dev at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev