[slf4j-user] slf4j in a microsoft vm enviroment !!!

[Konstantinos Karadamoglou]

I think I will rebuild the slf4j project without the Marker
functionality and I will deploy it using the NOP implementaion.

Are there any differences between NOP and Simple-Log?

Thank you in advance, Kostas


On 17/03/06, Ceki Gülcü <listid at qos.ch> wrote:
> At 05:49 PM 3/17/2006, Konstantinos Karadamoglou wrote:
> >On 17/03/06, Ceki Gülcü <listid at qos.ch> wrote:
> > > If you can spare a moment, you could compile SLF4J under JDK 1.1 yourself.
> > > It should not be difficult. I could help you if you run into trouble by
> > > answering your questions.
> >
> >I am just checking the source of slf4j and I was wondering that if I
> >will change the jdk 1.2 and above classes to jdk 1.1 equivalent then I
> >will end up with something incompatible to slf4j library. For
> >instance, the Marker interface contains the "iterator" method of type
> >iterator. If am going to change that to Enumeration then I am breaking
> >the library :(
>
> To very quickly answer your question, the result might not be exactly the
> same as the original SLF4J. However, I believe that in practical terms it
> should work in the context of applets. The Marker example should be the
> only one affecting the interface instead of implementation.
>
>
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
> http://ceki.blogspot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> user mailing list
> user at slf4j.org
> http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>