[slf4j-user] sl4fj/osgi/jcl11

[Costin Leau]

Hello everybody,

We're using slf4j inside Spring/OSGi for logging and so far it saved us
from quite a lot of trouble (imagine commons-logging and classloading
discovery in OSGi) not to mention that having the official distribution
OSGified is quite a time saver.

At the moment we are left with one major issue and that is having a
jcl11-over-sfl4j bridge. AFAIK, the only difference from jcl104 is that
trace() calls are using trace level rather then debug.
I have several code bases where trace is used extensively for low level
debugging and the jcl-104 behavior causes a lot of unnecessary output
and thus prevents to some extent using slf4j.

At least for me, it would be great if the jcl-11 behavior would be
supported.


Thanks!

--
Costin