[slf4j-user] SLF4J library using an image

[Rusty Wright]

Looks good.  I like the arrows.

To reiterate my question about writing a library, in my maven pom.xml 
for my library, I should only declare a compile/runtime dependency on 
slf4j-api.jar (that is, no scope, just  the groupId, artifactId, and 
version for slf4j-api), and in my docs explain that if their application 
is using commons logging that they should also add slf4j-jcl.jar to 
their classpath/dependencies, or if they're logging directly with log4j 
then they should add slf4j-log412.jar to their classpath/dependencies, 
or if they're logging directly with java.util.logging then they should 
add slf4j-jdk14.jar to their classpath/dependencies?


On 2011-08-14 13:56, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've updated the illustrations taking into account your comments. The
> updated files are located at:
>
>   http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg
>   http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png
>
>   http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg
>   http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png
>
>
> The audience for these illustrations are users with little or no prior
> understanding of or exposure to SLF4J. More concretely, with the help
> of these illustrations, new users should hopefully stop placing
> multiple binding artifacts on the class path at the same time.
>
> IMO, the arrows convey useful information with respect to direction of
> invocations albeit perhaps in a stylistically inelegant way.
>
> Anyway, your suggestions for further improvements most welcome. In
> particular regarding the unification of the stacked and arrowed styles
> (if possible).
>
> Cheers,