[slf4j-user] Which version to use with JPMS?

[Joachim Durchholz]

Am 02.12.18 um 03:53 schrieb Dan Stine:
> Here is one resource that covers the topic:
> 
> https://blog.joda.org/2017/05/java-se-9-jpms-automatic-modules.html
> 
> 
> On Nov 29, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org 
> <mailto:jo at durchholz.org>> wrote:
> 
> Am 29.11.18 um 16:50 schrieb cowwoc2020:
>> I'd like to publish my library to Maven Central but it depends upon slf4j
>> and we're advised not to publish artifacts to central if they depend upon
>> modules with Automatic Filename-based Naming.
> 
> What is "Automatic Filename-based Naming", and why is it a problem?

Ah thanks. I wasn't aware that this refers to the module name itself.

Sounds like SLF4J itself would ideally get a module name, but the 
interface code for each backends would need MANIFEST.MF entries until 
that backend is modularized, right?

Regards,
Jo